I neither see a different direction nor a different route, just a bit different approach to the same goal. But it's talking against windmills here, no use...
Sooooo... 1 sub faction of the 4 factions and it had to be Dark Angels, why not Blood Angels Death Company! Space Wolves Wolf Guard. Ultra smurfs Tyrannic Veterans, why nothing I understand Chaos get what it gets and we will throw a fit. Eldar as long as I get my Dark reaper I'll be fine. Orks I won't play em cause tide never liked the orken WAAGH!!! unless its Dawn of War.
Different direction, different route, different approach. I say tomatoe you say tomahtoe. I hear you pack master. As an aside I'm going with Ragnar's great company if it's not Logan's.
Thanks it's good to know that a good wolf listens. I will be playing the Death Company when I get around to playing marines.But the Hatred of Iron calls.
Which is fine but I don't want the other 3 factions to not get the love they deserve like everyone else. @Oveur
Don't need to remind me of stuffs I've already known. I only stand for facts. A Yes is a Yes. A No is a No. A Maybe is a freaking Maybe. People should train their brain to interpret which are dreams and hopes and which are realities and achievable goals. That's why I didn't fall for it when Miguel said he wanted Daemons, warp holes and such, that's why I can't accuse him of false advertising like Lyaerus. Because I could tell what were his dreams and what are currently planned to be ingame. If you interpret devs hopes for facts, and then get raged when your hopes may not come true. You deserve the same criticism that you think devs deserve. I give credit/and criticism when it's due. Don't expect me to take your side because you're a consumer like me.
Sorry, lost me here mate. I know for a fact that @Djemo-SRB and I called Miguel on a couple of his misinformed leaks. It was respectful and didn't take a lot of emo hype bullshit (or calling him a liar) but we deserve answers/corrections where they're appropriate. If anyone is willing to accept outright design shifts or failures to meet expectations then they are poor advocates for their own consumer rights. It is silly to decry other people's disappointments or take on defending the Devs without having facts. You don't have to be a dick about it of course but fuck letting anyone walk all over you without giving some explanation of why changes were made or what positives are expected of a revised approach. And there HAVE been things in EC confirmed (carelessly perhaps) that were later removed or re-categorized as unconfirmed. An explanation is not expensive or wasteful. I don't get why you don't expect better ? Consumerism isn't a dirty word. It's one of the healthier forces of capitalism.
terminator wasn't a "maybe" they becomed suddenly a maybe. terminator wasn't an "hope" dreadnought was an "hope" but never confirmed, never hinted to be more than an hope. Terminator was always been confirmed since the start then suddenly "nope we don't know maybe". this is pure no sense. It's not the fan that must "know where the dev can deliver or not", it's the dev that must know when they can deliver something and don't make promise when they are not sure.
Someone obviously remembered what games I've worked on. I know quite well the usefulness of "social environments" through experience and research. For this, I will give you a monocle.
