The BBC is supposed completely independent of even the British Government, though sadly it isn't. Yet at least it is not reliant on Sponsorship and Advertising revenue, which enables it to label bad products as being bad, report faulty products, and even go after companies for bad, if not illegal, behaviour. That's why the BBC can create review programs like Top Gear. If they think a car is bad, they can tell you. Yet any major TV Network in the US answers to its Sponsors and Advertising, and if any network offends such a company that company can threaten to withdraw its Sponsorship or Advertising. I am sad to say that Network Execs do fear this, even if a company would never actually do it, and do have a habit of preventing anything that would cause such offence. Did you ever watch Top Gear US? Did they ever actually say a car was bad? So if you watch the news on a channel with TV adverts in the US, chances are you won't get the same level of News Coverage as you would get with a UK channel. Just be glad neither country has TV like Egypt, where it's State-controlled!
"B-bu-but, muh Troubles!" Blah blah blah. Hark, do I smell a false equivalence? I do! I do smell a false equivalence! Wow, you wield fallacies like Thor wields Mjolnir. Truly, you are the greatest soc-jus mouth piece there ever was. A) look at how many Christians currently cause terrorism in the West. B) look at how many Muslims C) look at the Bible and then the Koran AND Hadiths. Contrast and compare. D) look at your wasted life and cry more, you White Knighting twat.
I would devote my soul to the chaos gods if they gave me the chance to visit the horrors of the 4 upon all SJWs
