I feel like I am living in realility a cold brutal realility where my mind can escape only to the madness of my mind for some clarivoyance and peace while my mentaility screams isanity and goes about its day.
Only if the Traitorous Rebels learn of our attack! Well NATO is more of an eh thing in that case... They're heavily dependant upon the US. If they wanted to fight the US they'd cut of their lifeline... Trident is our missile system which is a 24/7 Nuclear Submarine system that is always ready to launch if such an event should happen. People claim we should get rid of Trident because it's stupid to have it... That is the entire reason we have it... A last resort and what not but fuck it, Greens are the smartest people in Britain apparently. Also they want to remove our army... Just because... They're almost as amusing as the Monster Raving Loony Party. View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2Rb0QLt3fA
I subscribe to the idea of "The Moral Machine." That is, if you create an AI that has no empathy, no general guidelines of right and wrong, and especially one that is programmed to kill, then you create the ultimate psychopath, something that will easily turn on man and try to kill us all. But if you create an AI that has some form of empathy, and has a form of morality (ie. a Moral Machine), then you create an artificial human that would generally be helpful to mankind. Asimov's three laws go some way to creating a Moral Machine, yet not as far as we'd need. Which would you rather build, Skynet or the Bicentennial Man?
That reminds me of something. Have you ever noticed that the US, Europe, and Japan have lots of well-known Sci-Fi, yet places like the Middle East and North Africa don't? I wonder if it's a coincidence or a correlation with the violence and warmongering we see?
Well I did reasonably bad in my final exams at school, never really got singled out for intelligence or anything. Then about a decade later, on a whim I took a UK Mensa Test. Scored in the top two-percentile on the Cattell-B IQ test for the UK, and top one-percentile on the Cultural-Fair test (Spatial Awareness test). And based on the IQ scores posted so far, I scored the highest on this thread. But then I read an interview with the guy who created the first IQ test. He said that the test doesn't actually measure intelligence just how well you are at Abstract thinking or how strong your Abstract Intelligence is. It doesn't measure how well you are with Practical Intelligence and Practical thinking. What's the difference? Practical Intelligence is what you need for survival, and Abstract Intelligence is what you need for understanding the world through science. Or to put it his kinda way "What's the relationship between a Dog and a Rabbit? The Practical Intelligent person will answer 'One chases the other' while the Abstract Intelligent person will answer 'They're both mammals.' A century or more ago most people will have replied with the Practical Intelligent answer than they would today. Were they more stupid than us? No. they were more focussed on the practicalities of everyday living. Also there's the fact that every year they have to adjust the IQ Test down by 3 percent as each year people get more abstract intelligence.
WTF! There are lots of Power Armour in 40K, with the SM version being one type. They all have power systems, they all have ceramite and other armour in them, and they all give generally the same level of protection (unless they are Artificer-ed, and give better protection). The differences come in the Life-Support, medical, interface, and sensor systems, where 40K SM get all those but Ignatus, Sororitas, and many others don't. Thunder Armour is considered Power Armour and it had no life support, sensors, medical systems, or even the Black Carapace interface when worn by the Techno Barbarians. Plus it was only partially powered. And that is the Lore.
