I know opinions are like buttholes and most of them stink, but to me it has been a little disappointing accepting the fact it's not going to be open world at launch. Yet I'm not upset and it doesn't shake my belief in bE and that is because I feel that in the end, EC will be a game I play many years from now. I play video games to create my own story. I loved PS2 because it felt I was apart of something epic, the epic cqb fight for the bio lab, holding an outpost against a massive armored assault, and using a jump pack to scale a cliff to hit the enemy from behind. If EC can provide something at least similar to thay , I'm sold. I want to attack an outpost as my Mek as apart of the green tide, fight a titanic struggle with more vehicles and players joining the fray, and in the pivotal moment of the battle I aim my Shock Attack Gun to take out horde of the enemy and it malfunctions and blows me up. Maybe I'm just a fan boy and I miss glaring issues due to my desire for this to be a great game, but I have faith in the bE and the team they have assembled for EC. WAAAAAGGGGGGHHHHH!
Die You really expect them to be the first to this with almost no budget what so ever. I f that is the case I feel said for you that you have no brain cells at all
you mix German and English? Try google translate or something cause your post is a mess. And read again my earlier post, the SAID THEY HAVE THE BUDGET AND THE GAME ACCORDING TO THEIR PLAN IS FULLY FUNDED.
I'll attempt to translate you into English, I guess you wished to say: "Then, if you are aware of this what in the name of mating animals are you complaining about?" And if I understood you correctly then my answer is pretty obvious, If I was lied by a company in order to sell me something and the lie was revealed by their own new chief producer then it is a legit reason to complain.
read the whole thread he said himself in order to try to do what was promised he needs lots of more budjet and tech which does not exist yet. read thread.
I did i read but what you are saying and he is saying that they need more money because they dont have enough.
Sorry for butting in. Exactly, but if you remember, when the Founder Program started, they repetedly said that the game was fully funded to deliver what they promised (which were open world and massive battles with 4 factions). Now, with the latest news, it's clear that they greatly underestimated the amount of money needed to deliver what was initially promised. That's the reason we all are a little bit... edgy...
Okay so heres the latest: 3. I had heard on the grapevine that you're planning on cutting the number of continents available at launch, so is the remaining continent to be multiple (2-3+)times the size of one of the previously expected continents? What is the overall expected landmass in comparison to previous expectations? (6-8 64 square kilometer islands if I remember correctly)? David Ghozland: 1 continent 16x16 km for launch with 4-6 smaller islands around and some instance-able maps PvE and PvP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. What will the maximum player limit be per continent on release? Will it be similar to Planetside 2, where you can have up to 1200 players per continent? David Ghozland: The entire server population will be playing either on the continent, the islands or in the instanced maps. That should give you an idea of the number of player per continent. http://forum.eternalcrusade.com/threads/q-a-answers-compilation-thread.32349/page-2#post-738409
