I've defended the shit out of their decision to not do the open world. But even I know that it was still at least somewhat possible to do. Hell, every time I've pointed out ways they could just do a campaign system and not need an open world, I've been harassed to shit for it.
If you think that in one month the devs will complete the campaign map, test it, add the elites, properly optimise and balance this game, then you must be pretty delusional.
Unless they've worked their asses off behind the scenes. In which case they'll most likely just release a broken, unbalanced, buggy as hell version of all that.
You dont even need industry experience, or to go through courses. WIKI IS ALL KNOWING AND ALL POWERFUL. BOW BEFORE THE WIKI (Ps: I'm doing a game design course currently) I aint no pro, but I aint no hoe.
Dunno why i waste time on this but here i go: Most people do not play the game. Check statistics. We who still play are a minority of the people who own the game. And a very small one at that considering how many people own the game. Alot bought into this for features that are now scrapped. You might want to check all the outcry of doom threads we had. Not the game we have now. So you say yourself this game would be crap without a 40k skin? Now this is an insult to the devs. I actually like asymmetric lobby shooters! Worked nicely for all the other 40k crap out there. How about arguing with how the game is actually a good lobby shooter? But no the only thing saving it from dieing off seems that it is 40k according to you. Again i find this highly offensive against the devs and is kind of killing all of your argument. Judging a game for what it is now is good. I agree with this. As much as i agree here you must admit other peoples positions are not wrong. Behaviour asked for money for an idea. And some people pumped hundreds of bucks into it. And now they get something else. I personally will get my moneys worth out of it. But others might not. Alot of people would not give a fuck about what went on behind the scenes. But the crowd for buying this game would be a slightly different one. Different people would buy into the game if they know what they will be getting. According to your argument here founders access was a crap idea. They said they had money for the game in the beginning. Better make a game with that, dodge the shitstorm and add more stuff once it sells. (According to your logic) Again with the 40k thing... Because all the crappy 40k games coming lately have a very consistant player base... Also how is Namco to blame? The terms of service from EC force it to release now. Otherwise BeHaviour would have to openly publish a document explain all expenses from the beginning of development up to now. These terms existed from the beginning of the founders access way before Namco jumped in. But yeah let´s blame someone without researching anything. No one reads the terms of service. Yep they do not have more time because the terms of service apply. I get what Nathan is doing. Probably would do the same in his position. Does that make me happy as a consumer? Nahhhh. Also summer release was officially stated loooong ago. And look it is in summer. Also wouldn´t it be better to get the shitstorm out of the forums way before release? People interested in the game now because of the trailer might find this thread. No one can predict the future. No one but you it seems because all you did before this was explain in predictions how the game will not die off! You should take this to heart yourself. People do predictions. Just like you did in this whole post. If they aren´t allowed to talk like that is fact why are you allowed to? You talk about things like they are fact while you have no idea about them. You just did exactly that! You told us over ALOT of paragragphs why the game will be a success. You should read your own post again. Or is that all bullshit now? In that case you could have just left half of this wall of text out and make things easier for me. Just sitting quiet in a corner saying nothing is also not helping. If people are not happy about the product they purchased why are they not allowed to talk about it? Have you checked what people who call doom and gloom in here post regularly? Alot of them where actually nice parts of the community. Now this sounds like you have alot of confidence in this game. What news are you waiting for? This are the news. The release date are the news. I like this game. I do want it to succeed. But you are not helping anyone here.
No actually, I'm telling you guys to read a wiki article because I felt it'd be more within your level of knowledge, I have experience behind other, more reliable sources.
Can we see these sources? Or atleast know more about them? I'm sure we'd be more easily convinced to agree with you if we knew were were talking to the Stephen Hawking of the games industry.
