Yea I agree it is really tough to balance. Perhaps a longer wind up when unbraced? Less accuracy with more shots fired? I don't have the answers but I do believe it is slightly too strong as it is. E - I'll just remind everyone that the weapon might not be too strong in and of itself but too strong compared to its alternatives. If everyone picks the same weapon on the same class there is a reason for it and as I said earlier no Chaos have picks the HB. There are always a glut of havoks using AC on the chaos team, without doubt.
This is already planned and will be implemented some time soon. Right now AC have 2 times less the recoil on a spree then HB and it is an unnecessary edge, especially on long distances.
You confused "eldar" with "LSM". Eldar have exact same 100 armor they ever had on all classes. Toughness is also exactly the same 80 for light classes and 100 for heavy classes as it ever was. Hunters mark was nerfed very fast. Skimmers were nerfed. Meanwhile, LSM and CSM got 20 extra armor. LSM got 6 new weapons. You are going places kiddo.
I remember thread, when LSM whine about CSM +20 armor. They insist on "Only LSM deserve armor buff, not CSM". Do you remember?
I don't care what the Autocannon Defenders say. When the whole enemy team consists of Autocannons, something is wrong. And the trend goes that everyone seems to have AG just to have an autocannon. So something must be fishy about it... And im chaos player myself
Is smth wrong when the whole enemy team consists of HB?(hint: yes) Can you even support this claim? You cant even know it. I doubt you made any solid measurements on this topic. You see, this is empty claims like this one that creates biases that stick with ppl for a long time. Hardly any of my Chaos friends, who invested a lot of time into this game already, have bought AG.
Dude, i know you well enough. Im not discussing with you as nothing comes forth of that. Nag someone else please, thank you