Or maybe its just good players ?? 60+ kills is easy to achieve against a bunch of retards

that's why depends on how aggressive the player

my max is 51 normal map (scorpion very aggressive suicide bomber type)

and 67 siege ( yeah retards hiding in the same area, one plasma cannon charge, 5 enemy kills that was fun)

40 is almost nothing for siege

Muuhhh i dont enjoy being good , i prefer getting shit on and complain that others are too good and ruin the game by not being garbage

Someone got a lot of kills or more kills than me?

Must be using an aimbot.

There is nothing wrong with not trying your best. But there is something wrong with saying those who do should not be rewarded for it.

You dont need to break anything to be more effective than a crippled playing for the first time , 15 kills on a fortress map is unrealistic , any retard playing melee could get more

shit LSM players are still shit, no matter what you nerf

Kill-Count is not everything. Period. Healer with 0 kills can still be tremendously useful. Or those people who do body-shielding when needed...sure, they die, but they have an impact that may be greater than 5 kills.
And there are often enough matches where noone has more than 30 kills. This is the majority of games I see, tbh.

I play to win, I play the objective.

If someone is upset I killed them in a game where the objective is to kill them, it sounds like it is their problem.

Oh and nerf Eldar.