Background Image

32 vs 32 matches right now.

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Lichtbringer, Feb 4, 2016.

  1. Not sure if there was an announcement on the Forum, just saw it ingame.

    Edit: Oh yeah, and its not permanent, its just a short test. I know some guys missed the last time so I wanted to let them know :D
    Demetri_Dominov and Philos like this.
  2. PhilosAzel Philos Ordinate

    there is a steam announcement. 64 person maps will be fun today !!
  3. Oh lord jesus...the jetpacks.

    I can hear them coming for my Devastator already...making it rain on me V__V
    Ashgarm likes this.
  4. Redthirst Redthirst Eternal Battles Moderator

    Cool, so perfomance improvements won't matter because we get 64 players?
  5. Endemic Endemic First Blood!

    More skulls for the skull throne. More blood for the blood god
    roopevil and Philos like this.
  6. Its not fun at all for now, because its laggy and unplayble. They cant do 32 vs 32 in 2016 year, its a great shame.
  7. PhilosAzel Philos Ordinate

    What are you system specs ? This way I can compared them to mine and see what I am going to get my self into after work :)
  8. I have i5-3570k, 16gb ram and gtx 660ti. When it was 16 vs 16 - everything was fine. But now its unplayble.
  9. For me it's still better then before (AMD) even with 64 players. Right now it seems like the framerate is not affected that much, but rather the Servers.
  10. PhilosAzel Philos Ordinate

    Hey that awesome to hear / read !!

    I will let you know my FPs when I get home. I am running i7-4790k (4.6ghz) 8x 2300 OC ram, GTX 970 OC. 16v16 I can run max fps and graphics.

    I will update when I get home and let you know how my system handles 32v32.

Share This Page